OMB dangerous practices
exploits family COURT MINORS!!!
Tina Swithin One of One Mom's Battle's many campaigns is called "The Children Are Coming". The campaign name in itself is threatening, exploitive, and weaponizes minor children. Tina Swithin One Mom's Battle asks minor children to contact her with their Family Court story. She asks children to fight adult battles. OMB exploits and distorts minor's stories to further her online false propaganda. OMB encourages minor children to speak out publicly about the details of their parents divorce/Family Court case. Divorce/Family Court should not be a burden of the minor children. The Court's do everything they can to keep children out of adult settings and problems.
The main reason why Court Professinals want Family Court matters to stay in the courtroom is for the families safety and privacy; most importantly the child's safety and privacy. Afterall, a child should be able to reach an adult age before deciding if they want their story exploited publicly or not.
NSPO & OMB are the media and social media behind Kayden's Law. OMB claims Kayden's Law bans reunification camps, when it absolutely does NOT. OMB is helping pass Kayden's Law state by state, calling it a new name in each state. OMB targets a litigating Mother that has lost a child. OMB then further pushes her agenda, soley blaming the Family Court system, making herself the expert over Court trained professionals. OMB gaslights politicians to believe parental alienation is not real, Kayden's Law is safe, making politicians believe they are passing a safe law.
harasses, defames, doxes & INCITES HATE upON Court trained Professionals
Tina Swithin One Mom's Battle posts Court trained professionals pictures, professions, cities, & states. This act is against many State Laws that may include but are not limited to criminal behavior, cyber harassment, electronic harassment, criminal defamation, doxing, inciting hate, etc. Any and all Court trained professionals who find themselves doxxed by OMB should make a criminal Police Report at the very least. A Cease and Desist should be sent and possible Protective Orders can be filed against Tina Swithin for this criminal behavior.
The most dangerous part about this behavior is how Tina encourages and teaches other Mother's to do the same. OMB is teaching other litigating parents to publicly trash the very people in control of their case, child(ren), and parent time. OMB is teaching litigating parents to work against and blame the Court vs working with the Courts UNTIL, to get their child(ren) to safety. Sometimes the only way to beat false allegations, is to show the Courts your charcter over time. False Allegations are not the Family Court systems fault; but the person who made the false allegations fault.
onemomsbattle.com, nationalsafeparentsorganization.org, intheirbestinterest.com, alienationindustry.com, 'The Children Are Coming' and 'Custody Peace' are Tina Swithin and Danielle Pollack.
teaches mothers to disrespect court judges & professionals
Tina Swithin One Mom's Battle wrote in a social media post:
"The Court refers to our well organized court watching as 'mob' mentality.
What it actually is: Parents uniting and exposing the abuses taking place in the family court system".
Abuses of the Court system OR those making false reports?
So OMB knows the Court is not in favor of her organized Court watching, but still teaches litigating parents to do so anyways, AGAINST what is in the child's best interest which is for the parent to listen to all Court direction/suggestion.
Having Court watchers on your case, can send a message to the Court professionals on your case that you do not trust them. Consider inviting close family and friends to your Family Court hearings for support vs a ridiculous intimidating mob. Court advocates may also be available to be present at Court hearings if you feel more Court accounatbility is needed. Only litigating parents can hold Court professionals on their case accountable. The Court understands accountability but will frown upon the intent to blame / defame.
misleads litigating mothers, jeopardizing their parent-time
Tina Swithin One Mom's Battle, putting out false Family Court information & propaganda is the main reason this site was created. OMB misinformation is jeopardizing Mother's parent-time with their children. OMB does such a great job with marketing / advertising / aesthetically appeasing graphics / including compelling TRUTHS, with sprinkled in lies!!! #sprinkledintruth #sprinkledinlies
Most parents who are new to Family Court litigation are not able to point out the truths vs the lies.
OMB has 100-200 high conflict divorce coaches that she has trained herself. OMB and all of her HCDC's are spreading misinformation and hijacking the Family Court narrative discrediting all Court trained professionals.
One Mom's Battle dangerous misinformation and industry includes: divorce coaching, parent online training courses, Judge's training packets, subscriptions, books, shopping and more. Please see below.
omb industry / CAREER DOES TINA SWITHIN HAVE A VITAE?
Tina's Email
Hello Warrior Mommas –
In our world right now, there is great division. Probably worse than I have ever seen in my 50 years on this planet. I have personally witnessed and experienced fractures within the advocacy community over the past year - and it's been deeply painful on many levels.
There is a BIG topic that divides us and we cannot afford this division -that is the divide between:
1. Those who use the term "alienation."2. Those who understand why we should never use that word.
Last year, I publicly drew a line in the sand. I was done arguing with people who thought I was being "silly," because I was getting "caught up on a word" or that I was being too picky about terminology.
It's so much bigger than that and it's a conversation we must continue to have.
Let's start with the history:
Alienation is a debunked concept based on Dr. Richard Gardner's clinical observations, not scientific data and it is not recognized by the United Nations (UN), American Psychiatric Association (APA), the World Health Organization (WHO) or the American Medical Association. Gardner believed that society was too punitive when it came to adults having sexual relations with children. You read that right, and I invite you to read actual quotes from Gardner. In 2022, the federal government took a firm stance by enacting Kayden’s Law which calls for evidence-based training for family court professionals, a restriction on expert testimony and limiting reunification therapies and reunification camps. Equally powerful is the report by Reem Alsalem, UN Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women and Girls. There is a powerful documentary that was released last year titled, “The truth behind the experimental therapy that kids say starts with 'legalized kidnapping' – this documentary provides incredible insight into this topic and it is a must-watch. We invite you to learn more about the alienation industry and its history here.
Present day issues: Accusations of “alienation” are employed as a legal strategy to deflect from allegations (or findings of) abuse. We do acknowledge and validate that there are parents who attempt (and sometimes succeed) in turning children against the healthy parent. When this does occur, we are against utilizing any of the terminology (alienation, parental alienation, parental alienation syndrome, resist-refuse dynamic, pathogenic parenting, etc) that is co-opted and branded by those in the alienation industry and the fathers rights movement.
This is the crux of the matter:
Every time a mother uses the word, "alienation," she advances the father's rights movement. Every time a mother uses that word, she sets our advocacy efforts back and propels very dangerous people forward.
The state of our present day court system is a direct result of that word infiltrating the family court system. It is getting worse and not better because of that word.
If your children have been turned against you, I beg you not to use the word "alienation" to describe what is happening to you.
My analogy:
My marriage was toxic and abusive because my ex-husband was a sociopath (antisocial personality disorder).
My separation was terrifying, and I ended up in the women’s shelter with my children because my ex-husband was a sociopath.
My children became pawns and weapons during our very lengthy court case because my ex-husband was a sociopath.
My case was considered “high conflict” because my ex-husband was a sociopath
I was able to successfully protect my children at year six of our family court case and at year ten, we terminated my ex-husband’s parental rights because my ex-husband was a sociopath.
Everything that happened from the time I met my ex-husband (2000) until present day can be explained because my ex-husband was a sociopath.
With all of this said, I have never used the word, “sociopath” or “narcissist” to describe or label my ex-husband. As validating as that word has been for me personally and in my healing journey, I’ve never uttered either of those descriptor words in family court. I was able to successfully protect my children because I focused on his patterns of behavior – specifically, the patterns of behavior that affected my children. I documented everything – and then I documented more. If you are struggling with documentation or showcasing patterns of behavior, consider my documentation workshop.
Many people feel they need a word to use, If you absolutely must have a word, I recommend you read this article about CAMS. If your children have been turned against you, I highly recommend following Dr. Christine Cocchiola. You can also find her on Instagram: @dr.cocchiola_coercivecontrol
We must unite on this topic. We cannot afford to go backwards and we are currently going backwards and uphill. If you are upset and frustrated by the state of our court system, we must come together. We must work together to educate others about the dangers of this terminology. I beg you.
Whether you are new to this journey, or a seasoned veteran… my heart is with you and I am cheering you on. I am a firm believer that it only takes one healthy parent to create an atmosphere for children to thrive and... you are that parent. You hold so much power, even when you feel depleted by this battle. This is an isolating journey but it doesn’t have to be, together we are stronger.
Tina
###
OMB Legal Disclaimer: We are not qualified to give legal advice, nor should this be considered legal advice. Please consult your attorney before you implement any new strategies or communication styles. Your attorney is your voice and advocate in (and out of) the courtroom. GRAPHICS TO FOLLOW THIS SPECIFIC EMAIL, UPLOADING:
In our world right now, there is great division. Probably worse than I have ever seen in my 50 years on this planet. I have personally witnessed and experienced fractures within the advocacy community over the past year - and it's been deeply painful on many levels.
There is a BIG topic that divides us and we cannot afford this division -that is the divide between:
1. Those who use the term "alienation."2. Those who understand why we should never use that word.
Last year, I publicly drew a line in the sand. I was done arguing with people who thought I was being "silly," because I was getting "caught up on a word" or that I was being too picky about terminology.
It's so much bigger than that and it's a conversation we must continue to have.
Let's start with the history:
Alienation is a debunked concept based on Dr. Richard Gardner's clinical observations, not scientific data and it is not recognized by the United Nations (UN), American Psychiatric Association (APA), the World Health Organization (WHO) or the American Medical Association. Gardner believed that society was too punitive when it came to adults having sexual relations with children. You read that right, and I invite you to read actual quotes from Gardner. In 2022, the federal government took a firm stance by enacting Kayden’s Law which calls for evidence-based training for family court professionals, a restriction on expert testimony and limiting reunification therapies and reunification camps. Equally powerful is the report by Reem Alsalem, UN Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women and Girls. There is a powerful documentary that was released last year titled, “The truth behind the experimental therapy that kids say starts with 'legalized kidnapping' – this documentary provides incredible insight into this topic and it is a must-watch. We invite you to learn more about the alienation industry and its history here.
Present day issues: Accusations of “alienation” are employed as a legal strategy to deflect from allegations (or findings of) abuse. We do acknowledge and validate that there are parents who attempt (and sometimes succeed) in turning children against the healthy parent. When this does occur, we are against utilizing any of the terminology (alienation, parental alienation, parental alienation syndrome, resist-refuse dynamic, pathogenic parenting, etc) that is co-opted and branded by those in the alienation industry and the fathers rights movement.
This is the crux of the matter:
Every time a mother uses the word, "alienation," she advances the father's rights movement. Every time a mother uses that word, she sets our advocacy efforts back and propels very dangerous people forward.
The state of our present day court system is a direct result of that word infiltrating the family court system. It is getting worse and not better because of that word.
If your children have been turned against you, I beg you not to use the word "alienation" to describe what is happening to you.
My analogy:
My marriage was toxic and abusive because my ex-husband was a sociopath (antisocial personality disorder).
My separation was terrifying, and I ended up in the women’s shelter with my children because my ex-husband was a sociopath.
My children became pawns and weapons during our very lengthy court case because my ex-husband was a sociopath.
My case was considered “high conflict” because my ex-husband was a sociopath
I was able to successfully protect my children at year six of our family court case and at year ten, we terminated my ex-husband’s parental rights because my ex-husband was a sociopath.
Everything that happened from the time I met my ex-husband (2000) until present day can be explained because my ex-husband was a sociopath.
With all of this said, I have never used the word, “sociopath” or “narcissist” to describe or label my ex-husband. As validating as that word has been for me personally and in my healing journey, I’ve never uttered either of those descriptor words in family court. I was able to successfully protect my children because I focused on his patterns of behavior – specifically, the patterns of behavior that affected my children. I documented everything – and then I documented more. If you are struggling with documentation or showcasing patterns of behavior, consider my documentation workshop.
Many people feel they need a word to use, If you absolutely must have a word, I recommend you read this article about CAMS. If your children have been turned against you, I highly recommend following Dr. Christine Cocchiola. You can also find her on Instagram: @dr.cocchiola_coercivecontrol
We must unite on this topic. We cannot afford to go backwards and we are currently going backwards and uphill. If you are upset and frustrated by the state of our court system, we must come together. We must work together to educate others about the dangers of this terminology. I beg you.
Whether you are new to this journey, or a seasoned veteran… my heart is with you and I am cheering you on. I am a firm believer that it only takes one healthy parent to create an atmosphere for children to thrive and... you are that parent. You hold so much power, even when you feel depleted by this battle. This is an isolating journey but it doesn’t have to be, together we are stronger.
Tina
###
OMB Legal Disclaimer: We are not qualified to give legal advice, nor should this be considered legal advice. Please consult your attorney before you implement any new strategies or communication styles. Your attorney is your voice and advocate in (and out of) the courtroom. GRAPHICS TO FOLLOW THIS SPECIFIC EMAIL, UPLOADING:
Unite and Reform
Make a difference for others in Family Court by sharing your story and advocating for change.